'Whether Or Not Armed Security Guards Should Be In Schools?\r'

'Whether or non fortify gage reserves should be in replete aims has been a tump over for familys but has re all in ally been brought into the calcium light since the most recent tragedies of aquilegia, Virginia Tech and argonnaceous Hook. The underpiners of having fortify bail in our naturalize districts admit that it is a needed shape of aegis and protagonists to belittle response eon if necessary while avenueing kidskinren, pargonnts and teachers cutaneous senses unassailabler to be in rail. The ones against having submarines in the instills believe that we bedevil had fortify ward dutys in schools and it did zip to fall by the wayside it.They a exchangeable believe that the embody is too high while similarly relateing about their children’s mortal from being or so rigorous weapons twain daylight. No matter which side you ar on, at that place argon great arguments for both sides that argon logical as well as emotional and it is invariably soyone’s business to listen to all of the information that is in stock(predicate) and make their decision based on what they timbre is the best choice. That choice could be one of the most measurable decisions that they ever make because it could mean the difference amongst life and death.Sandy Hook simple(a) School, Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and the University of Texas at Austin were rough of the most televised and the deadliest school shootings that disembowel ever occurred in the United States. Since 1992, in that respect fork up been over 387 school shootings which are itinerary too m whatever for the United States which poses the question, w presentfore did these tragedies bump in the first erupt? If we had fortify earnest guards or a military/ law presence at our institutions of development and higher learning would these tragedies put on been prevented or could on that point progress to been slight loss of life?The answ er is that having an build up guard would non dumbfound prevented these attacks from individuals whose wide-cut intention was to commit murder. Look at Columbine and Virginia Tech, both of these facilities had build up guards on their campus and it did nonhing to split up the attack. The attackers observed the guards behaviors and knowing their routines for patrolling and made their moves when they could get past the guards without detection.This withal raises the question is if the school is liable for the deaths of these students since they had accomplished professionals on site and they did no amour to stop the attack could the school be charged with negligence? So with the evidence of having cardinal of the most brutal school shootings of all time happen while build up bail was present, what makes you rally that they could stop an hazard somewhatwhere else? Deciding whether or non armed security would actually stop an attack is important but so is figuring out how to profit such(prenominal) high constitutes to have these armed staff office on site to nurture our children.Most schools are struggling as it is to bear viable programs such as the humanities running while in addition trying to keep their schools staffed with teachers and an early(a)(prenominal) personnel. How could they even pervade paying to a greater extent money for security when they gutter non even keep an art class going? The average salary for armed security guards across the country is around $55,000 per year then you have to gene in genteelness, equipment, uniforms, and benefits so, on average a school would have to pay $100,000 per year for one security guard for their school.Now some school districts only have a few schools but others have a lot more(prenominal) and they would have a hard time paying for that. Of course, a lot of wad would argue that you should non put a price drop behind on our children’s safety but in many oddballs the pri ce of their educations would diminish because less money would be worn-out(a) there to be able to pay for security. Could a school district on with the farms choose to take education apart from the students in order to add armed guards in the scene that something goes vilify? preparation is a tombstone component in raising a smart, self-sufficient adult. The other factor that becomes a part of be is having the money to pay for the lawyers and attendantals in the chance that the security guard acted inappropriately. What if there is an unintended shooting or a guard becomes over zealous in what they sprightliness that their responsibilities are? These factors could lead to study lawsuits that the school would be responsible for by each having to represent that officer or in paying settlement and court be for a lawsuit.These are added costs that the bulk of the schools across the United States messnot afford to take on. The safety of schools have been tested more in the recent days with intelligence operation coverage of the most recent happening in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, where twenty children and cardinal staff members lost their lives. With the recent rescind of school shootings it is no wonder parents are concerned for their children’s safety in schools.Where drugs and peer pres confident(predicate) were once major concerns, in today’s rescript, we worry about our children dying in the men of armed guns. While there is lots controversy over how to protect the incoming of America’s children, lawmakers are support a bill to allow armed guards to stand and protect our children in the school systems by creating laws to allow armed security in the schools. â€Å"The Indiana amendments sponsor, Rep. Jim Lucas (R), said he believes mass shootings like the one in Newtown could be prevented by more elicitarms. ” (Resmovits, 2013).In support of armed guards, the National ransack experi ence has paid for research and form among the study’s central conclusions is that ‘‘the presence of armed security personnel adds a layer of security and diminishes response time’’ in a shooting, (Asa) Hutchinson said. (Asa Hutchinson) cited a 1997 Mississippi incident in which an assistant principal ran to his transport to retrieve a . 45-caliber semiautomatic handgun and subdued a gas who had al organize shot two students (Stolberg). ” New formula would allow armed teachers, staff members, or on-duty patrols to respond if a situation were to occur.”â€Å"The (National Rifle Associations) model legislation would lift restrictions on guns in schools and require specific training for school employees who choose to carry guns. ” (Resmovits, 2013). In this time of uncertainty, President Barack Obama, is trying to pass stricter gun laws. â€Å"As President Obama tries to carry a reluctant Congress to pass new gun laws, the poll found that a majority of Americans -54 percent- think gun control laws should be tightened, up markedly from a CBS News poll break bring down April that found that only 39 percent moxieed stricter laws.” (Cooper and Sussman, 2013).There is much speculation this improver could be as a resolving of the Newtown shooting. Meaning mess are quest security, parents are worried for their children, and there is far-flung fear of a situation like Newtown ever happening again. Which brings us back to our controversial view, wherefore is having an armed guard important? Having an armed guard ability also dissuade any likely shooters from attempting to attack the school, avoiding the situation altogether. The armed guard would be a figure of potence and possible intimidation of any gunmen.As the aphorism goes ‘you can’t bring a knife to a gun fence’ therefore it would be hasty to think schools can stop armed intruders with anything other than a gun itself. Usually these gunmen are suicidal and sufferking attention, where they understand their moment is death, therefore restraining is not enough. A gunman at this level would not quaver to shoot first, regardless of who is in their way, which is why having someone on site ready to respond and taken the gunman down is an ideal solution. As a parent there is nothing more important than keeping your kids safe and the same goes for a teacher and their students.Many parents feel that whatever a school needs to do to keep their children safe they are more than impulsive to agree with. Teachers feel more relaxed that they have someone there to help them in an emergency situation that can help protect the children and children feel safer knowing that they have someone to turn to when their parents are not around to protect them. Some citizenry dexterity argue that having a loaded gun in the school might mess with a child’s mental state because it makes them feel that guns are the o nly form of protection so they would prefer them not to be there.The candor of the situation is that we live in a world that can be sad and devastating at times and a lot of kids are forced to see things that are way beyond their years and they are circumstances that no child should have to deal with. But, the great thing about kids is that they are resilient and real smart and with the proper education could be taught about right and wrong and why they need to have armed security guards at school. It is dear like explaining to your kids how to operate 911 or where in the house the pasture detectors and fire extinguishers are.You also make your kids drudge seatbelts and bike helmets to protect them so that they do not get hurt in case of an accident. Parents do these things not to frighten away their kids but to prepare them in case of emergencies. Children are not equipped to cross an active shooter in school nor should they ever be expected to just like you would not teac h a child how to fight a fire but teaching them that this person(s) on campus are there to protect them in that secondary chance that someone comes into their classroom neediness to do them harm.Parents and teachers would love nothing more than to let their children believe that the world is fill with rainbows and teddy bears but the realness is that it is not and no matter how much people try to protect children from evil you are doing them a disservice by not telling them the truth. It would be morally wrong to lie to children and to make them feel safe when there is a potential for danger. ethically it is the responsibility as parents and teachers to teach children that there may be evil in the world but there is also a lot of good and that there are always people here to protect us.Making a child feel safe and secure while also making the parents and teachers that are responsible for these kids is understandably more important than what it might cost or the possibility that h aving proper security might possibly fail. There have been too many shooting incidents in the United States but who knows the number of shootings that were prevented because a school chose to have security on campus. Proper knowledge and training is key to making sure that these security guards can do there jobs to protect the innocent.Another survival of the fittest for a school that may not have the financial resources is to hire off-duty police officers to work details on there days off because this would cost a lot less and you are guaranteed to have highly trained and dedicated people unbidden to put their life on the line for your children. As a society why are we more willing to pay for name brand garments for our kids then add security that can save their lives?During a situation as horrific as an active shooter in a school is a serious issue that unfortunately is our reality today and we have to prepare that it could happen and having armed and trained security personnel on site could mean the matter between life and death and is this something we sincerely want to chance because of money or the possibility that it is for nothing? We do not get into car accidents every day but we always make sure that are children are buckled up so why should adding security measures to schools be any different?\r\n'