'Laws and Regulations Essay\r'

'Introduction\r\nBritish crude is the US’s largest corporation. One of the largest crude oil producers, BP work globally for billions of dollars from each one year. BP distri exceptes oil and indispensable gunman all over the world. British Petroleum has protract into several problems with federal official regulations over m whatever years. Beca exercise of sentry duty issues against the communities OSHA had to investigate many cartridge warders for oil spills and natural gas leaks. coca green goddess is also nonp aril of the largest community beverage companies on the world. coca Cola was used at first base to cure addicts yet the n it was rev angstrom united and used for making drinks for every adept. Like BP, Coca Cola had its issues with the law as well. They ache been accuse of violating human rights, pesticides in the ground urine, and finding cancer causing chemicals in the soft drinks. In 2008 it was concluded that Coca Cola was in direct violation FD A for wellness risk. We will comp be and contrast the risks of prophylactic regulations, OSHA violation, mathematical merchandise gumshoe and indebtedness, actors pay, and workplace training security department and place protection from Coca Cola and British Petroleum.\r\nOSHA\r\nThe occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) of 1970 is a federal regulation that establishes and enforces health and safety policy in the workplace (Goetsch, 2008). It covers private sector employers and employees and encourages states to participate in health and safety courses. States that participate receive half of its funding from the federal government (OSHA.gov, 2011). In the approaching of increasing aw beness and readying of health and safety, fellowship safety representatives must be up-to-date on laws, regulations and liability.\r\nThe OSH Act requires employers to view as statistical health and safety records and to report occupational illnesses and injuries under certain c onditions at each friendship location. The reporting conditions are the followers: â€Å"Death of one or more workers, one or more days international from work, circumscribe motion or restrictions to the work that an employee can do, bolshy of consciousness of one or more workers, take out of an employee to an otherwise job, medical treatment beyond in-house first aid (if it is not on the first-aid list, it is con lookred medical treatment), and any other condition listed in Appendix B of the rule” (Goetsch, 2008, p. 121).\r\nEmployers are responsible for informing employees nearly health and safety practices, laws, and regulations. OSHA regulations apply to BP and Coca-Cola with some aberrance because of the nature of the business. OSHA regulations include general industry standards and it provides health and safety training programs for employees and employers. In the last a couple of(prenominal) years, BP has been under much scrutiny. OSHA fined BP $87.4m for safe ty violations that led up to the 2005 Texas City refinery explosion (Walter, 2009). In 2010, BP’s disconnection of Mexico oil spill is still under investigation by the government. Insiders blame the spill on BP’s decision to shortcut procedures and skip a fibre test (Casselman & Gold, 2010). Unlike BP, Coca-Cola received OSHA credit entry in 2009 for having the highest employee safety and health standards at its Milesburg, PA site (OSHA.gov, 2009).\r\nWorker’s Compensation\r\n consort to Goetsch (2008) â€Å" the concept of worker’s fee real as a way to allow hurt employees to be compensated appropriately without having to take their employer to cost” (Overview of Worker’s Compensation, p. 174). British Petroleum (BP) and Coca-Cola are large brass instrument with locations around the world. Both organization involve over 90,000 workers worldwide and have worker compensation plans to make for certain injured employees are cared for. According to Ramos Law (2011), â€Å"workers at cytosine yearn injuries similar to that of other factory employees. These workers suffer elevate injuries from repetitive jobs such as mixing linguistic rule; k new(a) injuries from loading crop; or back aggravator from general warehouse jobs” (Hurt While Working at Coca-Cola or in the Beverage Industry?, para. 1). Coke needs to do a risk psychoanalysis and provide training to reduce the amount of workers’ compensation claims.\r\nBritish Petroleum (BP) had a massive oil spill in April of 2010 off the gulf of Mexico in which BP hired over 20,000 people to help groovy up the disaster. The care, training and protective accommodate for the kill crews was below safety standards. Training and protective gear could be the cause of the worker’s compensation claims that BP has will lapse to receive. According to Johnston Moore & Thompson Attorneys at Law (2011), â€Å"seven oil spill workers were hospi talized on May 26 after experiencing nausea, dizziness and headaches. foursome more were hospitalized on May 28, two of whom were admitted for breast pains” (First Workers’ Compensation Cases Building for Oil declension Cleanup, para. 4). The fumes from the oil and the touching of the hazardous square to try and reduce the damage caused many to flummox sick. The safety standards of BP are being questioned for both the workers and the touch areas that were hit by this devastating oil spill.\r\n mathematical product Safety and Liability\r\nProduct safety and liability is a law that was created to hold distributors, retailers, manufacturers, and suppliers responsible for injuries caused from the product (Goetsch, 2008). This law was intentioned so that in the take injury occurs the consumer is protected. There are a intention of different concepts that have laid the groundwork for the product liability law. The four major reasons that the laws were created were f rom, negligent manufacture, geological fault of warranty, strict liability in tort, and negligent design (Goetsch, 2008). Companies must take the time to ensure that the products that have been designed meet the safety standards to prevent probable instances from occurring. Coca Cola ensures that the product safety and liability is met by measuring the product and package requirements against the company standards.\r\nThe company uses â€Å"The Coca-Cola Management Systems” which is a woodland attention system that maintains the company’s operations worldwide, maintain the Coca-Cola standards (thecoca-colacompany.com, 2011). BP has been under the analysis for quite some time since the oil spill occurred that caused millions of dollars in damage to the gulf of Mexico. Since that time BP has created new ideas to monitor the waters that hold different oil rigs, these have been created to ensure quality supervise.\r\nBP has created an observation program that will su pport eternal monitor. (BP.com, 2011) This will allow for the creation of quality monitoring preventing additional instances of the oil spill occurring in the upcoming. This is definitive part of the product liability and safety program to ensure that the company follows the guidelines required to prevent future liability’s from occurring. This new quality monitoring will be able to â€Å"detect repositions deep down the water quality, marine mammal vocalizations and weather and water temperature” (BP.com, 2011).\r\nWorkplace Data and Property Protection\r\nIn the workplace the most important option to the company is security and protection. Companies spend millions of dollars creating systems to protect all the assets and data that passed through a system. At BP, system security over their data tying global partnerships each refinery is a goal amongst the company. British Petroleum train each employee to keep information confidential and away from media if there is a minor incident. The risk of an employee gap that code of silence about vital information is likely to happen.\r\nThey have contracts to state employees cannot talk to media or there will be consequences that could ultimately evanesce to termination. Environmental Protection Agency protects the property and materials produced by BP. EPA keeps the regulation on what products are safe for BP to use to drill oil. Coke Cola has similar issues of security, but they are interested in keeping new products under the table so they can have the advantage over their competition once they plunk a product. Their data protection requires a conceptive system as well. Both IT departments make sure systems do not get hacked by put up server walls on the system.\r\nThe security side of the results of companywide is an enterprise-level record of fictional character that becomes the official record for a given employee, customer, supplier, facility or other entity. Records of reference are th e gold standard against which all other records in the system must be validated. These restrain together the mass of company data and are at the core of the master data focusing approach to enterprise-wide integration (Goetsch, 2008). Although other large corporations are developing their own information frameworks, BP’s design is unique in that it specifically complements BP’s deconcentrate business structure. Casselman and Gold (2010) describes a situation in which a BP employee might have multiple records in one or more human pick databases, making it time-consuming to weed out the double data.\r\nConclusion\r\nThere are many risks and severalise information between the Coca Cola and British Petroleum. Both must follow rules and regulations of OSHA and federal laws in order to stay in business. Both companies had their shell out of setbacks when it came to employees and safety issues that made the public eye. Both companies continue to make billions of dollar s and each year as the rules change they are learning to change with it.\r\nReferences\r\nBP.com. (2011) BP Deploying Advance enervate Water Quality Monitoring Vehicles in Gulf of Mexico. Retrieved from http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=2012968&contentId=7064711 Casselman, B. and Gold, R. (2010). BP decisions set stage for disaster. Current, 524,14-16. Retrieved from Academic chase Complete.\r\nGoetsch, L. (2008). occupational safety and health for technologists, engineers, and managers (6th ed.). Upper appoint River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Johnston Moore & Thompson Attorneys at Law. (2011). Hunysvills Pearsonal Injusry Law. Retrieved from http://www.huntsvillepersonalinjurylaw.com. OSHA.gov. (2009). U.S. incision of Labor’s OSHA recognizes Coca-Cola Danone Waters LLC for workplace safety and health success. Retrieved from http://www.osha.gov/ pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&p_id=18137. OSHA.gov. (2011). United States Departmen t of Labor. Occupational Safety &\r\nHealth Administration. Retrieved from http://www.osha.gov/OSHA_FAQs.html. Ramos Law. (2011). Ramos Law watertight Workers’ Comp Blog. Retrieved from http://www.ramoslawblog.com. Thecoca-colacompany.com. (2011) Product Quality: Coca-Cola Quality. Retrieved from http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/quality.html Walter, P. (2009). BP handed 87.4m fines. Chemistry & Industry, 22, 7. Retrieved from Business Source Complete.\r\n'