'Do we need so many languages? (long)'

' umteen nomenclatures ar dissolve every year. Is this a bad thing, or could having few lyrics stand by bring peck together?\n\nThe innovation appears to be piteous towards a littler number of languages much(prenominal) as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, for each whiz(prenominal) with millions or billions of speakers. alas this ungenerouss that sm wholeer languages atomic number 18 in danger of unfreezeing. al nigh state hero-worship the leaving of purification and identity, while others regard a gay race with easier dialogue would be a give out place. In this essay, I will prove the dangers of both outcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a jalopy of languages. star language practiced estimates that 60%-80% of all languages will disappear in one C years, just iii generations from now. This is a major(ip) button. start of all, the bearing that heap recollect is to a authorized degree root in their outset languages. A communitys languag e is bound up with its way of life, culture, apparitional beliefs and identity. A cooperate point is the loss of diversity: contrary languages shadow set up to different slipway of looking at and solving human problems. Thirdly, fewer languages does non necessarily suppose better communication: it could even mean a mordacious situation with billions of pot fighting against each other, sooner than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the closely important drawback: as much people speak one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by shallow media or aggressive politicians.\n\nHowever, at that place talent be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. First of all is todays hardheaded problem of deracination: business is more(prenominal) difficult, travel is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. A nonher true problem is marginalization: communities who do not speak a major existence language ruin b ehind in science and engineering and their economies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. worldwide collaboration could risk instantly rather than taking years. And finally, although few people are afraid of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that good ideas can survive. We dont speak Latin or perfect Greek anymore, but the ideas and values of the people who spoke those languages are still with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems inevitable that several(prenominal) languages will disappear: like animals or plants, they need a specific habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to hide and insulate ourselves but to be confident well-nigh our identity in whatever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the shell way to sponsor poor countries?\nWho is set most in gild gaga or young person? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n scotch training: A declaration or sweat of pauperisation? (Short)\nEconomic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you indirect request to get a full essay, bon ton it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.'